"Face-to-face interviews are the only means of obtaining the volume and quality of recorded speech that is needed for quantitative analysis." Quantitative analysis requires the kind of data that must be obtained in a very obvious, formal way. An interlocutor's vernacular style is most likely displayed if they do not perceive outside observers, and are not paying immediate attention to their own speech. "Any systematic observation of a speaker defines a formal context where more than the minimum attention is paid to speech." In other words, even formal face-to-face interviews severely limit a speaker's use of their vernacular style. This "basic" style has the least variation, and provides the most general account of the style of a given group. "The vernacular, in which the minimum attention is paid to speech, provides the most systematic data for linguistic analysis." Labov characterized the vernacular as the original base mode of speech, learned at a very young age, on which more complex styles build later in life. According to studies conducted by Labov, this was one of the single most important factors that determined whether or not an interlocutor would make a style-shift. "Styles can be ranged along a single dimension, measured by the amount of attention paid to speech." Style-shifting correlates strongly with the amount of attention paid to speech. He summed up his ideas about style in five principles: "There are no single style speakers." Style-shifting occurs in all speakers to a different degree interlocutors regularly and consistently change their linguistic forms according to context. Labov primarily studied individual linguistic variables, and how they were associated with various social groups (e.g. William Labov first introduced the concept of style in the context of sociolinguistics in the 1960s, though he did not explicitly define the term. Additionally, speakers often incorporate elements of multiple styles into their speech, either consciously or subconsciously, thereby creating a new style. Rather, a speaker may use different styles depending on context. A style is not a fixed attribute of a speaker. Many approaches to interpreting and defining style incorporate the concepts of indexicality, indexical order, stance-taking, and linguistic ideology. Variation can occur syntactically, lexically, and phonologically. Linguistic variation is at the heart of the concept of linguistic style-without variation, there is no basis for distinguishing social meanings. In this context, social meanings can include group membership, personal attributes, or beliefs. Sociolinguistic research thus aims to explore social and linguistic diversity in order to better understand how we, as speakers, use language to inhabit and negotiate our many personal, cultural, and social identities and roles.In sociolinguistics, a style is a set of linguistic variants with specific social meanings. Attributes such as “female” or “upper class” do not have universal effects on linguistic behavior, and sociolinguists cannot assume that the most interesting linguistic differences will be between groups of speakers in any simple, binary fashion. Social categories such as gender, race/ethnicity, social class, nationality, etc., are socially constructed, with considerable variation within and among categories. For this reason, context matters in sociolinguistic research. Language is a social product with rich variation along individual, community, cultural, and societal lines. Simply put, language is not merely content rather, it is something that we do, and it affects how we act and interact as social beings in the world. Through the use of linguistic markers, speakers symbolically define self and society. Language is imbued with and carries social, cultural, and personal meaning. In contemporary theoretical perspectives, sociolinguists view language and society as being mutually constitutive: each influences the other in ways that are inseparable and complex. Sociolinguistics aims to study the effects of language use within and upon societies and the reciprocal effects of social organization and social contexts on language use. We use language to navigate expectations, to engage in interpersonal interaction, and to go along with or to speak out against social structures and systems. As speakers, we learn not only the structure of a given language we also learn cultural and social norms about how to use language and what content to communicate. Language is fundamentally at work in how we operate as individuals, as members of various communities, and within cultures and societies. The study of sociolinguistics constitutes a vast and complex topic that has yielded an extensive and multifaceted body of scholarship.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |